Skip to content
Thalorin
Open demo

Feynman Engine™

Path-integral optimization for multi-framework compliance. Rather than traversing regulatory frameworks sequentially, the engine computes probability amplitudes across the entire solution space — all overlapping requirements, all evidence paths — and converges on the minimal set of artifacts that satisfies every constraint at once.

One ontology. Many projections.

NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, SOC 2, CMMC, and FedRAMP are not separate territories. They are different projections of one shared compliance ontology. The Feynman Engine resolves the entire surface from a single coordinated artifact set — invariant beneath every framework.

FROM 5 SILOS
One
Unified Ontology

Five frameworks resolve from a single coordinated ontology.

FROM 12,000+ ROWS
N×1
Mapped Controls

Every control across every framework, attached to a shared evidence set.

FROM 1× / FRAMEWORK
N×
Reuse Coefficient

Each artifact propagates instantly to every framework it satisfies.

nothing done twice

Compliance is a graph of controls — thousands of them, tied together by evidence, attestations and dependencies. The engine works out how far a single artifact actually reaches across it, and settles on the least work that still covers every control you owe. Nothing is filed twice.

mfa-policy.pdf
NIST 800-53REV 5
  • AC-2
  • AC-3
  • AC-6
  • AC-7
  • AC-11
  • AC-17
  • IA-2
  • IA-2(1)
  • IA-5
  • IA-8
  • AU-2
  • AU-3
  • AU-6
  • AU-12
  • SC-8
  • SC-13
  • SC-28
  • CM-6
ISO 270012022
  • A.5.15
  • A.5.16
  • A.5.17
  • A.5.18
  • A.8.2
  • A.8.3
  • A.8.5
  • A.8.1
  • A.8.20
  • A.8.15
  • A.8.16
  • A.8.24
  • A.5.7
  • A.6.3
  • A.8.8
  • A.5.23
  • A.8.9
  • A.5.9
SOC 2TSC
  • CC6.1
  • CC6.2
  • CC6.3
  • CC6.6
  • CC6.7
  • CC6.4
  • CC6.5
  • CC6.8
  • CC7.1
  • CC7.2
  • CC7.3
  • CC7.4
  • CC5.2
  • CC8.1
  • CC9.1
  • CC1.4
  • CC2.1
  • CC3.2
CMMCLEVEL 2
  • 3.1.1
  • 3.1.2
  • 3.1.5
  • 3.1.12
  • 3.5.1
  • 3.5.2
  • 3.5.3
  • 3.5.7
  • 3.5.10
  • 3.3.1
  • 3.3.2
  • 3.3.5
  • 3.13.11
  • 3.4.2
  • 3.14.6
  • 3.1.7
  • 3.1.11
  • 3.7.5
FedRAMPMODERATE
  • AC-2
  • AC-3
  • AC-7
  • AC-11
  • AC-17(2)
  • IA-2
  • IA-2(1)
  • IA-2(2)
  • IA-5
  • IA-5(1)
  • IA-8
  • AU-2
  • AU-6
  • SC-8
  • SC-13
  • SC-28
  • CM-6
  • SI-4
1 document44 controls5 frameworks6 distinct requirements

Many-to-many becomes one-to-many.

Mapping a single piece of evidence to every applicable control across every framework is mechanical — and traditionally done by humans because tools could not reason about overlapping requirements. The engine collapses the matrix and expresses the entire requirement surface as a function of a small set of evidence primitives.

FROM PER-FRAMEWORK
One
Evidence Artifact

Submit once. Satisfies every framework it touches.

FROM REWORK
0
Duplicated Effort

Overlapping requirements collapse to a single canonical record.

FROM MANUAL
24/7
Continuous Mapping

Every new artifact is immediately mapped across all frameworks.

One artifact, every framework.

Once mapped, an artifact propagates across the engine's surface. A single MFA policy attaches itself to every framework's identity control; a new SSP section ripples to every FedRAMP and CMMC requirement it satisfies — without human intervention or duplicate filing.

NIST 800-53ISO 27001SOC 2CMMCFedRAMP
One artifact · shortest-path tree
  • NIST 800-5346/210
  • ISO 27001146/150
  • SOC 2114/120
  • CMMC82/150
  • FedRAMP22/180

The optimum emerges.

A thousand plans can close the same gaps, and almost all of them are the same work done twice. The engine weighs every one of them at once — the redundant ones cancel — and returns the one plan left standing: minimum evidence, minimum effort, every obligation met, ranked and explained alongside the reasoning that produced it.

Sum over plans · 1,024 candidates
  • PLAN ADEFER LOGGING & MONITORINGα* -0.68 · S″ 13.1
  • PLAN BFRONT-LOAD CRYPTOGRAPHYα* +0.63 · S″ 6.9
Cancelled 85.0 %Stationary-phase Δ 1.6 %
FROM EXPONENTIAL
Poly
Computational Cost

What was intractable becomes routine — every trajectory considered in real time.

FROM N CANDIDATES
One
Optimal Plan

Returned by the engine, with the full reasoning attached as audit trail.

FROM HUMAN-MONTHS
Minutes
Convergence Time

The full path-integral compute resolves before the meeting ends.

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself — and you are the easiest person to fool.
Richard Feynman · Caltech, 1974

Request research access.

The Feynman Engine is in research preview, available to select partners exploring the future of automated compliance.

Request access